Investment Thesis
I take a critical stance on TORM plc (NASDAQ:TRMD) through a deep-analysis that hones in on the undercurrents that could undermine its financial robustness. I believe that while the company’s past performance paints a picture of strength, it is the forward-looking indicators that now merit investor caution. The core of my argument orbits around the sustainability of TORM’s impressive dividend yield amidst sector volatility and operational risks.
I contend that TORM’s current high dividend payout ratio is teetering on the brink of sustainability. Given the headwinds faced in Q3 2023, including a contraction in earnings and profitability, I foresee a scenario where maintaining such shareholder generosity could strain the company’s financial reserves. Peering forward, this article will unravel the complexities of TORM’s market position amidst geopolitical tensions and environmental challenges that are undoubtedly linked to the shipping industry’s fortunes. From the piracy on the coastline of Somalia to the drought-stricken Panama Canal, I will explore how these global dynamics could impact TORM’s operational stability and, by extension, its stock valuation.
Introduction
TORM plc is a prominent player in the international shipping industry, specializing in the transport of refined oil products. The company’s fleet, consisting of product tankers of various sizes, serves the global demand for energy transportation. With a strategic focus on safety and efficiency, TORM operates its vessels under a combination of spot markets, long-term time charters, and strategic partnerships, offering flexible and reliable service to its customers. The company’s operational strategy is underpinned by a commitment to environmental sustainability and adherence to international regulations, ensuring responsible and competitive operations in the tanker market. TORM’s business model is designed to capitalize on the dynamics of oil product logistics, adjusting its service offerings to meet the evolving needs of energy markets worldwide.
Current Financials
The financial landscape for TORM plc in Q3 2023 offers a complex picture, one where historic gains are shadowed by emerging headwinds that may challenge the sustainability of their generous dividends. While the company achieved a monumental increase of 26% in time charter equivalent (TCE) earnings in the first nine months compared to the previous year, it’s imperative to delve into the nuances of these figures to understand the undercurrents at play.
On the surface, the strength of the product tanker market has provided robust tailwinds, with TCE per day remaining strong at $33,010 despite a significant YoY 25% decline from the extraordinary highs of 2022. This dip reflects a normalization of rates after the previous year’s peak, aligning more closely with long-term averages. Yet, this decline must be juxtaposed with the 9% increase in available earning days, which has not been sufficient to offset the rate drop, leading to a 23% contraction in TCE earnings to $244.4 million for the quarter.
A deeper concern surfaces when examining the EBITDA, which plummeted by 32% to $178.2 million. This contraction in profitability, coupled with an aggressive capital deployment strategy into fleet expansion, raises questions about the prudence of maintaining a high dividend policy. The declared Q3 dividend, at a pay-out ratio of 99%, is staggering, yet this may not be sustainable if market volatility persists and earnings continue to soften.
The sale and acquisition activities undertaken by TORM during the quarter further complicate the financial outlook. While the divestiture of vessels may indicate a strategic repositioning or a focus on liquidity, the aggressive expansion through acquisitions points to a confident long-term market outlook. However, these moves also entail substantial cash outflows and share issuances, which could dilute earnings per share and potentially strain the dividend payments if the market does not perform as expected.
In summary, while TORM’s financial performance has been historically strong in 2023, the dip in Q3 earnings, the high dividend pay-out ratio, and the substantial capital expenditures for fleet expansion cast doubt on the future sustainability of a 22% dividend yield. Investors should weigh the apparent short-term strength against these longer-term financial sustainability concerns, especially considering the volatile nature of the shipping industry (we will discuss this later). A conservative approach would advise a cautious stance and in my opinion, a sell, until clearer signs of financial stability emerge.
Forward Outlook
TORM’s financial outlook for the remainder of 2023 carries a cautious tone that investors should heed. The company has reported substantial coverage of its full-year earning days at competitive rates, which, at face value, suggests a stable revenue stream. Specifically, reported from the TORM investor relations page under Q3 results, 91% of the 2023 full-year earning days are covered at an average rate of $36,452 per day, and 64% for the fourth quarter at $38,822 per day. Despite these seemingly robust figures, there is a considerable caveat to consider: the volatility and unpredictability of the Time Charter Equivalent (TCE) rates, which could sway significantly from current projections. Management has cautiously indicated that:
“the market rates realized during 2023 may be significantly lower or significantly higher than our current expectations” – TORM plc Financial Outlook
This acknowledges the limited visibility on not-yet-fixed TCE rates. This uncertainty is a critical factor for my sell rating. The anticipated TCE earnings range of USD 1,075m-1,125m, along with the EBITDA forecast of USD 825m-875m, are hinged on current market conditions that have already shown signs of contraction in Q3. These projections include earnings from vessel sales, which can be considered one-off gains rather than sustainable operational earnings.
The reliance on such sales to meet financial outlooks could signal underlying weaknesses in operational revenue streams, underscoring the potential for overestimation of financial health. Jacob Meldgaard, CEO of TORM, suggests optimism for the year’s end, driven by “seasonal factors and continued favorable market conditions.” However, given the recent performance and inherent market risks, this perspective may be overly optimistic and too promising; an easy statement to disappoint.
Investors are advised to look beyond the surface of management’s positive expectations and consider the substantial risks posed by market volatility and the high dividend pay-out ratio. Given these factors, coupled with the reduced earnings and profitability seen in Q3, the prudent course of action aligns with a sell stance, anticipating that the market’s buoyancy may not be sufficient to uphold the optimistic forecasts and sustain the high dividends going forward.
My Concerns
The recent news that the U.S. Treasury Department has sent notices to over 100 ships potentially involved in transporting sanctioned Russian oil is highly concerning for product tanker companies like TORM. As a large product tanker company, TORM relies heavily on demand for oil transportation across the globe. If more countries begin cracking down on the transport of Russian oil, it could significantly impact the number of voyages and profits for tanker companies.
If sanctions expand and reduce Russian oil exports from the Baltics and other European ports, it could disproportionately impact companies like TORM. The risks of violating sanctions also brings into question due diligence and compliance policies at these transporters. Overall, this news poses regulatory and market uncertainties that strengthen the sell-thesis for exposed shipping stocks like TORM in the current environment. Reduced Russian oil voyages appear increasingly likely in 2023, threatening revenues.
Following, TORM plc operates within the notoriously volatile oil tanker shipping industry, a sector that is particularly susceptible to geopolitical conflicts, regional instabilities, and climatic challenges. These factors collectively forge an environment rife with uncertainty, which underpins my sell rating for the company.
The geopolitical landscape presents a minefield of risks for shipping companies like TORM. The ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, despite periods of de-escalation, remains a source of unpredictability that can affect shipping routes and oil prices. Similarly, the protracted military engagement between Ukraine and Russia has substantial repercussions for global oil markets, given Russia’s role as a key oil producer. Sanctions imposed on Russia and the disruption of Black Sea routes could lead to increased costs and operational complexities for TORM.
In the Middle East, perennial tensions, not just limited to the threat of conflict but also the ongoing issues with piracy, particularly around the Somalia coast, pose direct threats to TORM’s operations. While international naval patrols have reduced the incidence of piracy, the risk cannot be discounted entirely. Any resurgence could lead to higher insurance premiums and longer, costlier shipping routes as vessels avoid high-risk areas, impacting TORM’s bottom line.
Furthermore, environmental factors such as the severe drought affecting the Panama Canal have direct implications for TORM. The Canal is a vital waterway for global shipping, and any delay due to climatic events forces ships to take longer alternative routes, leading to increased fuel costs and delays in product delivery, which in turn can erode earnings and profitability.
These geopolitical and environmental challenges are compounded by the inherent cyclicality and fluctuating demand within the oil tanker shipping industry. TORM, despite its operational strategies, cannot be fully insulated from these external shocks, which are natural happenings that are unpredictable. The culmination of these risks can lead to revenue volatility, unforeseen expenditures, and operational hurdles, all of which can significantly impact the stock price.
The significance of these concerns lies in their unpredictability and potential to drastically alter market dynamics. For investors in TORM, these elements should be a clarion call to reassess the risk profile of their investment. The high dividend payout ratio, while attractive, may not be sustainable if these geopolitical and environmental risks materialize and begin to eat into cash reserves and profitability.
In conclusion, TORM’s vulnerability to geopolitical strife, regional instabilities, piracy threats, and environmental challenges strengthen my sell thesis. The potential impact on the oil tanker shipping industry from these risks is substantial, with the possibility of eroding TORM’s financial performance and destabilizing its stock price. In such an environment, a conservative stance is warranted, favoring the protection of capital over the pursuit of high, yet possibly unsustainable, dividends.
Is There an Upside? Is This a Stable Investment?
In the bigger picture, oil, despite the global shift towards greener energy sources, remains an indispensable commodity in modern society. Its role extends far beyond its well-known use as a fuel for combustion in vehicles and industries. In fact, the versatility of oil is such that it is a critical ingredient in a vast array of products and industrial processes, making it a staple in the global economy.
Firstly, the petrochemical industry relies heavily on oil as a raw material. It’s used to produce plastics, synthetic fibers, and a variety of chemicals. These materials are integral to numerous products, from packaging and insulation to clothing and medical equipment. The ubiquity of plastics in everyday life underscores oil’s continued relevance.
Secondly, oil plays a crucial role in the pharmaceutical industry. Many medications are derived from petrochemicals. This includes not only the drugs themselves but also the casings of capsules and the coatings of tablets.
Furthermore, the beauty and personal care industry also capitalizes on oil derivatives. Products like lotions, cosmetics, and soaps often contain ingredients derived from oil. It is also pivotal in the production of synthetic rubber, which is essential for manufacturing tires, seals, and various other rubber products.
Lastly, the energy sector, despite moving towards renewables, still depends on oil, particularly for backup and peaking power plants. These plants are crucial for maintaining a stable power supply, especially when renewable sources are inconsistent.
Furthermore, TORM has distinguished itself as a dividend powerhouse, boasting an impressive trailing twelve-month yield of approximately 22%. This remarkable figure indicates that the company has consistently provided substantial returns to its shareholders through dividends. But is this dividend sustainable? In a sector often characterized by volatility, TORM’s ability to sustain such a high yield is a must. However, the dividend sustainability for TORM is under scrutiny given the financial metrics from Q3 2023. Although the company has managed to declare a substantial dividend of $1.46 per share, the pay-out ratio of 99% is precariously high. In the context of financial prudence, such a high pay-out ratio leaves little room for reinvestment or cushioning against market downturns. Furthermore, the reduction in TCE earnings alongside a drop in EBITDA points to a contracting profit margin that could directly impede the ability to sustain such high dividends. If TORM continues to navigate through market volatilities and operational risks without adjusting this pay-out ratio, they risk depleting reserves or accruing debt, which could ultimately lead to a reduction or suspension of future dividends to preserve cash flow. This is a red flag for investors who might be attracted by the current high yield but are potentially facing a cut in dividends if the company aligns its distribution with the more modest and sustainable earnings profile indicated by Q3 results.
For investors seeking income-generating assets, TORM’s past dividend yield makes it an attractive option, if in-fact that is steady going forward; it is up for debate and questioning whether the dividend remains at 22%, but I do not think it is sustainable.
In conclusion, while the world is undeniably moving towards greener energy sources, oil’s role as a key ingredient in a multitude of non-combustion applications cements its place in the global economy. Its versatility and indispensability in various industries ensure that oil (a current volatile market itself) will continue to be a significant player in the global market, making it a potentially stable investment if the dividend remains. But I do not believe the 22% yield will hold. In my perspective, I see it tumbling and therefore causing a risky investment if investors solely depend on the principal gain.
Valuation
Firstly, TORM’s forward Price to Earnings (P/E) ratio is reported at 4.40, which is a sharp decline of 54.83% from the sector median of 9.73. A P/E ratio below the sector median could suggest that the stock is undervalued, or it could signal that the market expects future earnings to deteriorate. Seeking Alpha’s ‘A’ grade for this metric indicates a favorable comparison against peers. However, in the context of a sell thesis, this lower P/E could be interpreted as the market pricing in the anticipated headwinds and the potential overvaluation of future earnings, considering the volatility in TCE rates and the possible inability to sustain high dividends.
Moving to the forward Price to Sales (P/S) ratio, TORM stands at 1.85, which is 37.54% higher than the sector median. This ‘C’ grade by Seeking Alpha suggests that TORM’s stock is less attractive compared to its peers in terms of sales valuation. In simpler terms, investors are paying more per dollar of sales for TORM than for other companies in the sector, which could be a deterrent for investment, especially if growth prospects are not robust enough to justify such a premium.
Finally, the Price to Book (P/B) ratio on a trailing twelve-month (TTM) basis for TORM is 1.67, marginally higher than the median of 1.64. This also receives a ‘C’ grade, indicating a middling valuation in terms of the company’s book value. While not as critical as the P/E or P/S ratio, the P/B ratio still suggests that the market is valuing TORM at a slight premium over its book value, which could be concerning if asset impairments or write-downs occur, a possibility if market conditions worsen.
In synthesis, these valuation metrics suggest a market sentiment that is neither overly bullish nor bearish in its purest form. However, I interpret these numbers as signs of overvaluation in light of potential future earnings risk, operational challenges, and market volatility that TORM faces.
Conclusion
I stand on a sell rating after a deep-dive into TORM’s financial sustainability, the robustness of its impressive dividend yields, and the volatility inherent in the oil shipping sector. I’ve charted the potential impact of geopolitical tensions and environmental factors on operational stability, which could, in turn, sway stock valuation. Throughout this article, the interplay of robust past performance against a backdrop of emerging challenges has been scrutinized, suggesting that the stock may not withstand the prevailing headwinds without strategic recalibrations. Thus, I present a conservative perspective, prioritizing capital protection over high-yield pursuits in an unpredictable market landscape.
Read the full article here